hibernate - Is "flush" of session must called in this case? -

-

i defined "booking" entity "part" entity ,their relationship 1 many.now in case had such operation

step 1:retrieve 1 booking fk,assume under booking,it has 3 part,then show in ui

step 2:in ui,i add 1 new part,then mark original 3 saved part deleted part,finally save booking again.

now in back-end,i handle saving logic following

first,my booking action's save function following

       public string save() throws exception{             booking = presave(booking);             booking = dosave(booking);             booking = postsave(booking);             return success;         }

the dosave function following

@transactional(propagation=propagation.required,isolation=isolation.default)         private booking dosave(booking booking) throws exception{             logger.debug("save booking start,will delete deleted/update/save record in db");             //step 1:get booking dao spring context             bookingdao dao  = (bookingdao) daofactory.getdao("booking");             //step 2:get deleted object booking tree,as usual,the deleted object marked in ui             list tobedeleted = bookingutil.handledeletedobj(booking);              logger.debug("the deleted object ["+tobedeleted+"]");              //step 3:if deleted object not empty,invoke booking dao's delete function delete them              if(tobedeleted!=null && tobedeleted.size()>0){                   dao.delete(tobedeleted);              }              //step 4:invoke booking dao's save function save/update obj             booking = (booking) dao.save(booking);             return booking;         }

delete function in dao

@override @transactional(propagation=propagation.required,isolation=isolation.default) public object delete(object object) {     // todo auto-generated method stub     logger.debug("delete deleted object ["+object+"]");     if(object == null){         logger.error("there no deleted object found");         return null;     }     session session = sf.opensession();     if(object instanceof  list){         list list = (list) object;         for(object obj:list){             session.delete(obj);         }         //session.flush();         return list;     }     return object; }

save function in booking dao

@override

@transactional(propagation=propagation.required,isolation=isolation.default)

public object save(object object) {     logger.debug("save() start,save booking["+object+"] db");     booking booking = (booking)object;     string bookingno = null;     //step 1:check if booking no empty,if empty,generate booking no customer first     if(booking.getbookingno() == null || booking.getbookingno().trim().isempty()){         logger.debug("save(),find booking no empty,will generate booking no first");             bookingno = (string) generatebookingno(booking.getcustomer());             //set generated booking no booking             booking.setbookingno(bookingno);     }      //step 2:set part's fk bookingno     list <part>parts = booking.getparts();     if(parts!=null){         for(part part:parts){             if(part.getbookingno() == null || part.getbookingno().isempty()){                 part.setbookingno(booking.getbookingno());             }         }     }     //step 3:set todoitem's fk     list<todoitem>todoitems = booking.gettodoitems();     if(todoitems!=null){         for(todoitem todoitem:todoitems){             if(todoitem.getbookingno() == null  || todoitem.getbookingno().isempty()){                 todoitem.setbookingno(booking.getbookingno());             }         }     }      //step 4:save/update booking     session session = sf.getcurrentsession();     session.saveorupdate(booking);     session.flush();     return booking; }

as see,my logic quite simple:delete stuff , save stuff,beside point,they should in 1 transaction,but when test,i found after call save action's save(),the parts didn't been deleted @ all,the log following:

17:37:36,143 debug bookingdao:122 - delete deleted object [[com.chailie.booking.model.booking.part@712e3058, com.chailie.booking.model.booking.part@f681b75, com.chailie.booking.model.booking.part@7be2a639]] 17:37:36,144 debug sessionimpl:220 - opened session @ timestamp: 13676602561 17:37:36,147 debug defaultdeleteeventlistener:65 - entity not persistent in delete processing 17:37:36,149 debug versionvalue:44 - version unsaved-value strategy undefined 17:37:36,150 debug identifiervalue:104 - id unsaved-value: null 17:37:36,153 debug defaultdeleteeventlistener:180 - deleting [com.chailie.booking.model.booking.part#2] 17:37:36,154 debug sessionimpl:1308 - setting cache mode to: 17:37:36,155 debug sessionimpl:1308 - setting cache mode to: normal 17:37:36,160 debug sessionimpl:1308 - setting cache mode to: 17:37:36,162 debug sessionimpl:1308 - setting cache mode to: normal 17:37:36,162 debug defaultdeleteeventlistener:65 - entity not persistent in delete processing 17:37:36,163 debug versionvalue:44 - version unsaved-value strategy undefined 17:37:36,163 debug identifiervalue:104 - id unsaved-value: null 17:37:36,164 debug defaultdeleteeventlistener:180 - deleting [com.chailie.booking.model.booking.part#3] 17:37:36,165 debug sessionimpl:1308 - setting cache mode to: 17:37:36,165 debug sessionimpl:1308 - setting cache mode to: normal 17:37:36,166 debug sessionimpl:1308 - setting cache mode to: 17:37:36,166 debug sessionimpl:1308 - setting cache mode to: normal 17:37:36,167 debug defaultdeleteeventlistener:65 - entity not persistent in delete processing 17:37:36,168 debug versionvalue:44 - version unsaved-value strategy undefined 17:37:36,168 debug identifiervalue:104 - id unsaved-value: null 17:37:36,169 debug defaultdeleteeventlistener:180 - deleting [com.chailie.booking.model.booking.part#4] 17:37:36,170 debug sessionimpl:1308 - setting cache mode to: 17:37:36,171 debug sessionimpl:1308 - setting cache mode to: normal 17:37:36,171 debug sessionimpl:1308 - setting cache mode to: 17:37:36,172 debug sessionimpl:1308 - setting cache mode to: normal 17:37:36,173 debug jdbctransaction:103 - commit 17:37:36,174 debug sessionimpl:337 - automatically flushing session 17:37:36,174 debug jdbccontext:201 - before transaction completion 17:37:36,175 debug sessionimpl:393 - before transaction completion 17:37:36,176 debug jdbctransaction:193 - re-enabling autocommit 17:37:36,177 debug jdbctransaction:116 - committed jdbc connection 17:37:36,178 debug jdbccontext:215 - after transaction completion 17:37:36,178 debug connectionmanager:296 - transaction completed on session on_close connection release mode; sure close session release jdbc resources! 17:37:36,179 debug sessionimpl:422 - after transaction completion 17:37:36,179 debug sessionimpl:353 - automatically closing session 17:37:36,180 debug sessionimpl:273 - closing session 17:37:36,180 debug connectionmanager:374 - performing cleanup 17:37:36,181 debug connectionmanager:435 - releasing jdbc connection [ (open preparedstatements: 0, globally: 0) (open resultsets: 0, globally: 0)] 17:37:36,182 debug jdbccontext:215 - after transaction completion 17:37:36,182 debug connectionmanager:296 - transaction completed on session on_close connection release mode; sure close session release jdbc resources! 17:37:36,183 debug sessionimpl:422 - after transaction completion 17:37:36,184 debug sessionimpl:273 - closing session

but when add session.flush() in end of booking dao's delete(),it delete part in db successful.

so question is: when didn't have flush() in dao's delete function(),why part can't deleted?

ps:my session factory spring configuration following:

bean id="sessionfactory"         class="org.springframework.orm.hibernate3.annotation.annotationsessionfactorybean">         <property name="datasource">             <ref bean="datasource1" />         </property>         <property name="hibernateproperties">              <props>                 <prop key="hibernate.dialect">                     org.hibernate.dialect.mysqldialect                 </prop>                 <prop key="hibernate.show_sql">true</prop>                  <prop key="hibernate.transaction.flush_before_completion">true</prop>                   <prop key="hibernate.transaction.auto_close_session">true</prop>                    <prop key="hibernate.connection.release_mode">auto</prop>                    <prop key="hibernate.hbm2ddl.auto">update</prop>                    <prop key="format_sql">true</prop>             </props>         </property>          <property name="packagestoscan">                <list>                     <value>com.chailie.booking.model.*</value>                 </list>       </property>


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

c++ - Function signature as a function template parameter -

-
i'd use function signature template argument. works great classes, when try same trick function templates, msvc throws error: error c2768: 'func' : illegal use of explicit template arguments here's code: template <typename signature> void func(); template <typename r, typename a1> void func<r(a1)>(); what should make work? you cannot partially specialize function template, not supported language. can create partially specialized class template static member function, , possibly trampoline function instantiate class template , invoke static function. something this: namespace detail { template<typename signature> struct helper; template<typename r, typename a1> struct helper<r(a1)> { static void call() { // stuff r , a1... } }; } template<typename signature> void func() { detail::helper<signature>::call(); }
Read more

algorithm - What are some ways to combine a number of (potentially incompatible) sorted sub-sets of a total set into a (partial) ordering of the total set? -

-
i have sorting problem i'm pretty sure doesn't have canonical "answer" - has number of different approaches, each pros/cons. i'm interested in hearing different approaches. suppose bunch of people {p_i | i=1,...,m} ranking favorite ice cream flavors. in total there n different flavors, single person p_i ranks n_i << n flavors or familiar with. i'm interested in combining these sub-rankings plausible overall ranking of n flavors. for concrete situation: m , n both 1000 (by coincidence), , each n_i 20 . can assume there's enough overlap in flavors people rank such no flavor "isolated". again, i'm interested in hearing different ways approach this, if there isn't single clear answer. thanks! one way approach problem construct directed cyclic graph representing of constraints on ordering of elements. nodes in graph represent different elements compared , have edge first node second node if had ranked first e...
Read more

How to call a javascript function after the page loads with a chrome extension? -

-
there's function on page want call after loads. not own page, can't insert html it. can please provide specific examples how chrome extension or greasemonkey? (function submitaction() ). both chrome extensions , greasemonkey offer ways specify when script inject if executed. in chrome extension, you set in manifest : "content_scripts": [ { "run_at" : "document_idle", in greasemonkey compatible userscripts, set in metadata // @run-at document-end in both cases, have add script if want ensure resources loaded when function executed : document.addeventlistener('load', submitaction);
Read more